Perspectives on Women
May 20th, 2007 by Sonja

book photoNot too long ago a book made its appearance in our home. It arrived with the LightMom; a gift from the GrandPea to his oldest grandson (LightBoy). It’s called the Dangerous Book for Boys.  At about the same time, Julie Clawson wrote about some serious misgivings she has about the book.  She makes some points that I’ve given some thought to.  But I’m not terribly concerned about them.  We’ve all been reading the book, including LightMom, who wished that the book had been around when she was a girl.  I want to build the crystal radio with the LightChildren, and I’m teaching LightBoy to quilt, LightGirl plays ice hockey, it would be fair to say that LightHusband does more cooking than I do.  So we tend to be fairly gender neutral in our house.  I worry about those books in terms of our culture, but also know that on a case by case basis I have more control over how my children perceive them than I previously recognized.

Then I took LightGirl and one of her friends to play hockey one afternoon and the friend (nicknamed the Beast by her team) told a story about her middle school softball team.  It seems that the girls softball team and the boys baseball team share equipment room space and practice time.  They do not, however, share a liking for each other.  So they have taken to playing somewhat mean jokes on one another.  This is not done in a spirit of fraternity, but in getting even, and ill will.  The latest prank was that  the girls broke into the equipment room and tied tampons and pads all over the boys equipment.  They thought this was hilarious.  I guess if you’re 13 it is.  What was disturbing to me is that the girls coach aided and abetted them in this endeavor.  LightGirl brought the incident up with me this morning.  We talked about it.  I told her I found it somewhat disturbing that the coach assisted in this.  I also told her that my biggest problem was that for centuries men have found women’s menstrual blood and the products they use to deal with it unclean and the butt of jokes.  So the girls were just perpetuating that myth and denigrating themselves by playing that joke.  They were, in a sense, further putting themselves down.

Without menstrual blood, we would not have the human race for much longer.  It is that monthly cleansing of the womb that allows pregnancy and prolonging our species.  It’s high time we acknowledged that far from being unclean and a joke, it is what allows us to be and continue being.  It is what makes us intensely feminine, female and other and beautiful.  And I am far more concerned about those underlying centuries old issues that women and girls continue to perpetuate as well as men.  May we learn to find beauty in these things as well.


8 Responses  
  • Scott writes:
    May 21st, 20075:51 amat

    Oh I think you’re blowing this a bit out of perspective. I don’t think that the environment of a middle school locker room is right for the comprehension of the wonders of menstrual blood. It boils down to it just being a practical joke and nothing more. The thought of unused tampons being tied to the boys equipment was simply funny as boys that age would emit the same “Ewwww gross” that girls that age might emit when talking about semen ejaculation of boys. Face it …us guys don’t have a similar item as tampons. Our Miracle Grow emission, aka Baby Batter, doesn’t build up and then explode out once a month; if it did we’d have to wear a similar item no doubt. What if in the cold weather we had to wear little penis mufflers to keep them warm? Maybe if we had to do that then the boys would have something to tie to the girls’ equipment. [ Think of knitting a very tiny sweater with a short body, an elastic waist, and a long neck ] Yeah.

    I don’t think the coach or the girls were guilty of undermining the sanctity of their gender. It was just a practical joke, and as such, it’s juvenile. Maybe next time Beast can sneak in and paint their bats pink.
    😉

  • Paul writes:
    May 21st, 20076:28 amat

    yeah i have to agree with Scott – i haven’t thought periods were particularly unclean ever – they are just a part of the great rhythm of life.

    I had to laugh at the joke the gals played – sounds more empowering than anything to me :)

  • aBhantiarna Solas writes:
    May 21st, 20077:10 amat

    LOL … Scott, you’re lucky I don’t know how to knit, or you might find a very interesting package in the mail one day 😀

    I will just note, that as both of you taking exception to this are men, you haven’t experienced the darker side of this particular rhythm. It’s easy for you to say, “Lighten up, the back of the bus isn’t so bad, when you have the choice of where to sit.”

    Yes, it was just a middle school prank and as a prank, I’ll admit it was kinda funny. But it’s also indicative of larger, uglier biases we have in our culture against women. This was a moment when the coach might have chosen to help these young women to grow and learn to to be good sportswomen, instead he chose to let them remain where they were.

    Paul, your point about being empowering is interesting, though … I’ll have to think about that. And, Scott, since the Beast’s favorite color is pink, she just might do that!!

  • Scott writes:
    May 21st, 20079:32 amat

    Hey…the bus analogy’s sort of out of synch there. Ya know for years and years, it was considered the polite thing to do … was to give up your seat for a lady who boarded a bus and needed a seat, so they could sit. Doubt you see that much now though.

    Maybe the boys will put condoms on the girls equipment next.

    And as for my sweater. Sorry but I won’t be sending you my measurements. You’ll have to guess.
    😉

  • aBhantiarna Solas writes:
    May 21st, 200710:14 amat

    hahahaha! well … as I said, I don’t know how to knit, so we’re both safe. 😀

    Well … perhaps the back of the bus analogy is going overboard, but bear with me as I make a point. That is this, many men have a markedly different perspective on what is and is not prejudice towards women than many women do. So that what you perceive as just a harmless juvenile prank (and it does have the hallmarks of that), I see as having a darker genesis in the roots of our culture. Does that make sense? And it would be nice if everyone (regardless of gender) made room on bus seats for those who are weaker and more needy than they (e.g. the elderly or parents with small children in tow, etc.). But you don’t see much of that either today.

  • Julie Clawson writes:
    May 21st, 20074:44 pmat

    Hi. Thanks for the link. You’re right about how individual people/families differ, but I still see there being larger cultural issues with this. To me its a message that individual families shouldn’t even need to “work around” especially since there are way too many families where messages of encouragement for kids to be themselves (as opposed to a stereotype) are rare.

    The tampon incident raised some good questions. I do wonder if it is a fear of women’s bodies alone or the remains of a dualistic conception of reality that despises all things physical?

  • Julie Clawson writes:
    May 21st, 20076:00 pmat

    p.s. I posted on this topic over at Emerging Women

  • aBhantiarna Solas writes:
    May 21st, 20076:28 pmat

    Hi Julie … you\’re welcome. I really did enjoy your post and thought there was a lot of meat to it. It made me think about and look at the book good and hard. I do hear what you\’re saying too about the overall cultural message.

    And I really like your post on Emerging Women. Good stuff … :)


»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa